Hello There, Guest! Login Register — Login with Facebook
[PROBLEM] 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83
Thank you for your donation
|
Problem: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83
|
|
14th Dec, 2012, 12:00 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83
What do you mean by zram? Also force_turbo is useless in Alpha 3 due to our kernel configuration.
And it you want to compare systems, make everything the same: - Config file - SD card - Movie etc. Lower class SD cards sometimes have a higher random read/write speed in contrast to the sequential throughput. pilight - modular domotica solution
|
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 13th Dec, 2012, 10:43 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 13th Dec, 2012, 11:07 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - crs - 13th Dec, 2012, 11:44 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 13th Dec, 2012, 11:43 PM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - DraZtiK - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:39 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 14th Dec, 2012 12:00 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:02 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - rikardo1979 - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:12 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:20 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 14th Dec, 2012, 09:17 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - DraZtiK - 14th Dec, 2012, 11:13 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 14th Dec, 2012, 10:06 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 23rd Dec, 2012, 09:10 AM
|