Hello There, Guest! Login Register — Login with Facebook
[PROBLEM] 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83
Thank you for your donation
|
Problem: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83
|
|
14th Dec, 2012, 09:17 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83
Why zram?... zram is fully integrated in the Linux kernel and uses lzo compression. Compress memory on the fly to reduce swapping. Uses a small amount of cpu, however the reduced i/o usage more than makes up for this.
checking codecs/network troubleshooting makes sense if I was having the same issue with 0.83. The fact that things work smooth and fast on 0.83 compared to alpha3 is why I brought up the issue. Nothing wrong with my network/codec etc. |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 13th Dec, 2012, 10:43 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 13th Dec, 2012, 11:07 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - crs - 13th Dec, 2012, 11:44 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 13th Dec, 2012, 11:43 PM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - DraZtiK - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:39 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 14th Dec, 2012, 12:00 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:02 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - rikardo1979 - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:12 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 14th Dec, 2012, 06:20 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 14th Dec, 2012 09:17 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - DraZtiK - 14th Dec, 2012, 11:13 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - CurlyMo - 14th Dec, 2012, 10:06 AM
RE: 1.0 Alpha 3 slow FPS vs. 0.83 - agent5150 - 23rd Dec, 2012, 09:10 AM
|