Forum
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
Hello There, Guest! Login Register — Login with Facebook

[SOLVED] After updating yesterday...
Thank you for your donation

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Solved: After updating yesterday...
11th Aug, 2016, 05:44 AM
Post: #8
duno
Unregistered
 
RE: After updating yesterday...
(11th Aug, 2016 03:48 AM)Nachteule Wrote:  @duno

can you remember which kernel version you were running?

Latest, 4.4.15+ and update was to 4.4.16+


Code:
btrfs-show-super -a /dev/sdc2
superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/sdc2
---------------------------------------------------------
csum            0x323e98ec [DON'T MATCH]
bytenr            65536
flags            0x1
            ( WRITTEN )
magic            _BHRfS_M [match]
fsid            2dcbf32f-7a95-41ff-bf52-65d5b4f547a5
label            xbian
generation        82234
root            33685504
sys_array_size        97
chunk_root_generation    49679
root_level        1
chunk_root        147456
chunk_root_level    0
log_root        0
log_root_transid    0
log_root_level        0
total_bytes        31111249920
bytes_used        5725069312
sectorsize        4096
nodesize        16384
leafsize        16384
stripesize        4096
root_dir        6
num_devices        1
compat_flags        0x0
compat_ro_flags        0x0
incompat_flags        0x179
            ( MIXED_BACKREF |
              COMPRESS_LZO |
              COMPRESS_LZOv2 |
              BIG_METADATA |
              EXTENDED_IREF |
              SKINNY_METADATA |
              unknown flag: 0x10 )
csum_type        0
csum_size        4
cache_generation    82233
uuid_tree_generation    82232
dev_item.uuid        70322777-7343-4491-ae65-295472f29d6d
dev_item.fsid        2dcbf32f-7a95-41ff-bf52-65d5b4f547a5 [match]
dev_item.type        0
dev_item.total_bytes    31111249920
dev_item.bytes_used    8896118784
dev_item.io_align    4096
dev_item.io_width    4096
dev_item.sector_size    4096
dev_item.devid        1
dev_item.dev_group    0
dev_item.seek_speed    0
dev_item.bandwidth    0
dev_item.generation    0

superblock: bytenr=67108864, device=/dev/sdc2
---------------------------------------------------------
csum            0x0f19fcb1 [match]
bytenr            67108864
flags            0x1
            ( WRITTEN )
magic            _BHRfS_M [match]
fsid            2dcbf32f-7a95-41ff-bf52-65d5b4f547a5
label            xbian
generation        82233
root            23609344
sys_array_size        97
chunk_root_generation    49679
root_level        1
chunk_root        147456
chunk_root_level    0
log_root        0
log_root_transid    0
log_root_level        0
total_bytes        31111249920
bytes_used        5725073408
sectorsize        4096
nodesize        16384
leafsize        16384
stripesize        4096
root_dir        6
num_devices        1
compat_flags        0x0
compat_ro_flags        0x0
incompat_flags        0x179
            ( MIXED_BACKREF |
              COMPRESS_LZO |
              COMPRESS_LZOv2 |
              BIG_METADATA |
              EXTENDED_IREF |
              SKINNY_METADATA |
              unknown flag: 0x10 )
csum_type        0
csum_size        4
cache_generation    82233
uuid_tree_generation    82232
dev_item.uuid        70322777-7343-4491-ae65-295472f29d6d
dev_item.fsid        2dcbf32f-7a95-41ff-bf52-65d5b4f547a5 [match]
dev_item.type        0
dev_item.total_bytes    31111249920
dev_item.bytes_used    8896118784
dev_item.io_align    4096
dev_item.io_width    4096
dev_item.sector_size    4096
dev_item.devid        1
dev_item.dev_group    0
dev_item.seek_speed    0
dev_item.bandwidth    0
dev_item.generation    0

got a match on

Code:
csum            0x0f19fcb1 [match]
bytenr            67108864
flags            0x1

Code:
btrfs-show-super -s 67108864 /dev/sdc2
superblock: bytenr=67108864, device=/dev/sdc2
---------------------------------------------------------
csum            0x0f19fcb1 [match]
bytenr            67108864
flags            0x1
            ( WRITTEN )
magic            _BHRfS_M [match]
fsid            2dcbf32f-7a95-41ff-bf52-65d5b4f547a5
label            xbian
generation        82233
root            23609344
sys_array_size        97
chunk_root_generation    49679
root_level        1
chunk_root        147456
chunk_root_level    0
log_root        0
log_root_transid    0
log_root_level        0
total_bytes        31111249920
bytes_used        5725073408
sectorsize        4096
nodesize        16384
leafsize        16384
stripesize        4096
root_dir        6
num_devices        1
compat_flags        0x0
compat_ro_flags        0x0
incompat_flags        0x179
            ( MIXED_BACKREF |
              COMPRESS_LZO |
              COMPRESS_LZOv2 |
              BIG_METADATA |
              EXTENDED_IREF |
              SKINNY_METADATA |
              unknown flag: 0x10 )
csum_type        0
csum_size        4
cache_generation    82233
uuid_tree_generation    82232
dev_item.uuid        70322777-7343-4491-ae65-295472f29d6d
dev_item.fsid        2dcbf32f-7a95-41ff-bf52-65d5b4f547a5 [match]
dev_item.type        0
dev_item.total_bytes    31111249920
dev_item.bytes_used    8896118784
dev_item.io_align    4096
dev_item.io_width    4096
dev_item.sector_size    4096
dev_item.devid        1
dev_item.dev_group    0
dev_item.seek_speed    0
dev_item.bandwidth    0
dev_item.generation    0

But how to restore that?

Code:
bytenr            67108864

is normally "s 1" but

Code:
btrfsck -s 1 /dev/sdc2

or

Code:
btrfs check -s 1 /dev/sdc2

gives an

Code:
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
ERROR: superblock checksum mismatch
couldn't open because of unsupported option features (10).
Couldn't open file system


I do not understand this btrfs-stuff Sad
Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
After updating yesterday... - Peiote - 7th May, 2016, 10:41 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 7th May, 2016, 11:38 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 10th Aug, 2016, 10:09 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Peiote - 7th May, 2016, 11:49 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 8th May, 2016, 12:33 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 11th Aug, 2016, 12:53 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 11th Aug, 2016, 03:48 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 11th Aug, 2016 05:44 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 11th Aug, 2016, 06:37 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 11th Aug, 2016, 07:49 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 11th Aug, 2016, 08:37 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - f1vefour - 11th Aug, 2016, 12:51 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 11th Aug, 2016, 10:54 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 14th Aug, 2016, 01:52 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 14th Aug, 2016, 03:43 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 14th Aug, 2016, 06:20 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 14th Aug, 2016, 08:09 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 16th Aug, 2016, 02:12 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 16th Aug, 2016, 03:18 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 16th Aug, 2016, 03:58 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 16th Aug, 2016, 04:14 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - duno - 16th Aug, 2016, 05:25 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 16th Aug, 2016, 03:20 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 19th Apr, 2017, 07:55 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - rikardo1979 - 19th Apr, 2017, 04:54 PM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 20th Apr, 2017, 12:10 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 20th Apr, 2017, 04:31 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 20th Apr, 2017, 04:47 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 20th Apr, 2017, 05:04 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 20th Apr, 2017, 05:16 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 20th Apr, 2017, 06:09 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - rikardo1979 - 20th Apr, 2017, 06:12 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 20th Apr, 2017, 06:22 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 22nd Apr, 2017, 07:35 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 26th Apr, 2017, 02:14 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 26th Apr, 2017, 06:02 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - ThePumisher - 8th May, 2017, 02:02 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Nachteule - 8th May, 2017, 02:20 AM
RE: After updating yesterday... - Antonio - 18th May, 2020, 09:27 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

Current time: 22nd May, 2025, 07:41 AM Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.