+- Forum (http://forum.xbian.org)
+-- Forum: Software (/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Releases (/forum-48.html)
+--- Thread: XBian Release Candidate 3 (/thread-2451.html)
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - menakite - 14th Sep, 2014 10:35 PM
The 2 mount errors are really only warnings and can be safely ignored.
As for the DNS errors, check your Internet connection and/or the network configuration on the Raspberry Pi. I'm able to resolve sverigesradio.se (134.25.4.140). Google is used to check if the device can access the Internet, in the "System Info" window - it's possible that it tries to check if Google is reachable if a DNS request (the one for sverigesradio.se) fails too.
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - Skywatch - 15th Sep, 2014 04:08 AM
Thanks for the extra info!
As it happens, about an hour later the internet went down and stayed down for about 5 hours! (nightmare!)..... But before it did I managed to update and upgrade the few bits that were offered for that pi and I will test it out tomorrow again.
Looks like it might have been a fault with the BT (British Telecom) broadband.
Thanks.
Skywatch
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - nsviper - 16th Sep, 2014 03:05 AM
CEC stuff anyone? or is it just me?
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - danell - 18th Sep, 2014 05:51 AM
I updated my xbian today and saw "updating to 1.0RC3".
I have also read a lot that everyones says to stick with RC2, so I'm wondering if there is any way to downgrade to RC2?
Searced but couldn't find aynthing
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - CurlyMo - 18th Sep, 2014 05:56 AM
Revert your snapshots.
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - rikardo1979 - 24th Sep, 2014 07:01 PM
(16th Sep, 2014 03:05 AM)nsviper Wrote: CEC stuff anyone? or is it just me?yup, the CEC doesn't work anymore and also video refresh rates(Adjust display refresh rate to match video) doesn't work either on RC builds
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - Smultie - 24th Sep, 2014 08:25 PM
(24th Sep, 2014 07:01 PM)rikardo1979 Wrote:(16th Sep, 2014 03:05 AM)nsviper Wrote: CEC stuff anyone? or is it just me?yup, the CEC doesn't work anymore and also video refresh rates(Adjust display refresh rate to match video) doesn't work either on RC builds
No problem here.
Lastest xbian_package_xbmc is looping though:
Preparing to replace xbian-package-xbmc 13.2-RLS-1411544010 (using .../xbian-package-xbmc_13.2-RLS-1411544010_armhf.deb) ...
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - aztech - 24th Sep, 2014 09:04 PM
I'm on RC3 and today I wanted to upgrade a few packages, but it fails on btrf snapshoot.
Terminal
root@xbian:/etc# cat /etc/xbian_version
1.0RC3
root@xbian:/etc# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
xbian-package-config-shell xbian-package-initramfs-tools xbian-package-xbmc xbian-update
4 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/30.6 MB of archives.
After this operation, 479 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
/usr/sbin/btrfs-auto-snapshot: line 456: 100 - (mdu*100 / mdt) : division by 0 (error token is ") ")
Error: root is not existing volume.
/usr/sbin/btrfs-auto-snapshot: line 1: 2434 Segmentation fault exit 138
E: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Pre-Invoke '[ ! -e /etc/default/xbian-snap ] || . /etc/default/xbian-snap; [ $ENABLEDAPT = yes ] || exit 0; z=$(findmnt -n /| awk '{print $2}'); z=${z#*\[\/}; export z=${z%%\/*}; if [ -x /usr/sbin/btrfs-auto-snapshot ]; then bt rfs-auto-snapshot snapshot -k $KEEPAPT -l apt-run $z ; fi ;'
E: Sub-process returned an error code
root@xbian:/etc#
Setup is running on a model B.
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - nsviper - 24th Sep, 2014 09:32 PM
(24th Sep, 2014 07:01 PM)rikardo1979 Wrote:(16th Sep, 2014 03:05 AM)nsviper Wrote: CEC stuff anyone? or is it just me?yup, the CEC doesn't work anymore and also video refresh rates(Adjust display refresh rate to match video) doesn't work either on RC builds
Thanks for the update, I'll keep an eye open for future fixes
everything else is fine, so using android remote for now is good.
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - crs - 24th Sep, 2014 11:36 PM
Unpacking replacement xbian-package-kernel ... │
│ dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xbian-package-k │
│ trying to overwrite '/lib/firmware/htc_9271.fw', which is als │
│ dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken │
│ Errors were encountered while processing: │
│ /var/cache/apt/archives/xbian-package-kernel_3.12.26+-1407563 │
│ E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
So my RC update looks smooth this am, but the Kernel upgrade is a no go. I SSH in (v1 & v2 Pi) su - xbian & run updates every few days. Will try it from command line after work. Have a great day & XBian team, awesome work!
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - rikardo1979 - 24th Sep, 2014 11:39 PM
(24th Sep, 2014 09:32 PM)nsviper Wrote:(24th Sep, 2014 07:01 PM)rikardo1979 Wrote:(16th Sep, 2014 03:05 AM)nsviper Wrote: CEC stuff anyone? or is it just me?yup, the CEC doesn't work anymore and also video refresh rates(Adjust display refresh rate to match video) doesn't work either on RC builds
Thanks for the update, I'll keep an eye open for future fixes
unfortunately
I have tested different distro and there is no problem what so ever with CEC or switching between refresh rates. so this is XBian related
Hope guys going to fix this weird issues soon
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - josch - 25th Sep, 2014 06:11 PM
[Post has been moved.]
AS IT COULD GET A BIT CONFUSING HERE, I MOVED MY SPECIFIC PROBLEM TO:
http://forum.xbian.org/thread-2265-post-24515.html
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - CurlyMo - 26th Sep, 2014 02:07 AM
A new RC3 image has been uploaded that should fix (most) issues.
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - josch - 26th Sep, 2014 07:47 PM
The current RC3 is absolutely amazing! My RPi was never like that incredibly responsive before.
Absolutely fast, smooth and stable for me right now.
Great work!
PS: Inside xbian-config's XBMC GUI there is a typo: "VNC Serveur" -> "VNC Server"
RE: XBian Release Candidate 3 - CurlyMo - 26th Sep, 2014 07:49 PM
@josch, can you create a github issue about it?