beta2

[mk01]

(2nd Oct, 2013 03:37 AM)namtih Wrote:  Is it also available for us in the future? Any plans, even it's still beta?
http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/4986
http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=174485

Perhaps important if we want to stay with Frodo first:
http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=174485&pid=1516260#pid1516260
"Testing will be on Gotham. I'll backport to Frodo afterwards."

ok so this is how propaganda works. but you brutus?

I'm never happy when asked to comment such stories / informations but - I don't see any difference there to my setup. I'm using the "recently added" on home as well. Days/Weeks ago I was commenting the slowness of confluence with larger Library, maybe you remember. I was also asking whether it is just my local problem or it "standard" - as I have never used Confluence before. Got ZERO answers. Confluence is fastest skin - if started on clean XBMC. Then it goes only worse. What is that video? Surprise, again AMBER. The one I was confluence comparing with.

I'm definitely sure if popcorn says there are optimizations then they are there. On the other hand I remember optimizations in OMXplayer which made movies with DTS-ES unplayable for months. And DTS very broke.

You are not the first one, who is asking me this today. If there needs to be a PR with message "wheel really works. and look - it is wheeling" - so be it.

And to answer your question about availability. There is no reason not to merge commits from upstream. So yes, as it appears on nightly / master it will of course appear in XBian. Sooner during popcorns internal beta testing? Better not.

We can still do it on request, one patch more will not delay the auto daily building process but I have not seen there reason to put 1h into this.

And will also just provide info about Gotham status. If you list few pages back this thread or the previous (but still beta2) and you will look for XBMC issues - ALL of them are from period where I pushed Gotham to Beta2 repo. Gotham was also quite slower than Frodo with back ports at that point - but I don't remember if it was compiled with full debugging (the MACOSX versions at ALPHA stages are for sure).

mk

---

(2nd Oct, 2013 07:21 AM)Dave400 Wrote:  I've also noticed that although the timezone is set correctly, it's 5 hours behind!

where. system / xbmc ? what "date" command is showing? where you see 5hours behind?