Hello There, Guest! Login Register — Login with Facebook
Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
Thank you for your donation
|
Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
|
|
2nd Jan, 2013, 09:19 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
Hi,
Is there any advantage (e.g., one accesses content faster, is less processor intensive, etc.) of using NFS by either:
Or are they the same? Doug |
|||
|
|
2nd Jan, 2013, 10:05 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
They do the same, however mounting them with fstab makes the sources XBMC independent, which is easier for some people to manage.
pilight - modular domotica solution
|
|||
|
|
2nd Jan, 2013, 10:29 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
Thanks. I'll be managing my content via a windows desktop, so I guess I'll go with #2.
|
|||
|
|
|
2nd Jan, 2013, 08:57 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
Option 3:
Shared sources XBian Skin Beta Testing Clock Screensaver If you liked my help, click on "Thanks" to show your appreciation. |
|||
|
|
|
3rd Jan, 2013, 10:42 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which way of accessing a source via NFS is better?
(2nd Jan, 2013 08:57 PM)brantje Wrote: Option 3:Look's interesting! So to connect to my Windows HTPC sources, I'd do what is listed on github . com/xbianonpi/wiki/wiki/Shared-sources (links not working for me) on my Pi and change "<to>SMB://192.168.1.x/xbmc/sources.xml</to>" to "<to>nfs://myWindowsIPAddress/c/Users.../xbmc/sources.xml</to>" |
|||
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|