Forum
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
Hello There, Guest! Login Register — Login with Facebook

beta2
Thank you for your donation

Pages (51): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 51 Next »
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
beta2
4th Sep, 2013, 08:12 PM
Post: #16
mk01 Offline
Registered
Posts: 2,485
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 209
RE: beta2
Probably I will take all the code around special handling of xbian-update package out. As it is not needed anymore.

Will let you know.

Please read rules and do a search before you post! . FAQs . How to post log file? . Looking for answers? Please start here
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
4th Sep, 2013, 11:23 PM
Post: #17
IriDium Offline
Inquisitor
******
Posts: 2,025
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 170
RE: beta2
Xbian-copier works.

So only - xbian-config -> Upgrade and Backup are outstanding.

So as far as I can tell, there are no real outstanding issues with this release.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok I've tried Confluence, Amber and now Confluence-for-xbian.

@mk it seems you have created Beta 1.2 just for you and me.

It seems very quiet from other users - or may be it is sooo good that there aren't any problems!!

Please read before you post
How to post a log file

If you liked my help, click on "Thanks" to show your appreciation.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
5th Sep, 2013, 02:11 AM
Post: #18
f1vefour Offline
Administrator
******
Posts: 1,342
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 58
RE: beta2
I just don't have any problems.

Please read rules and do a search before you post! | FAQs | How to post log file? | Can't find an answer? Contact us.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
5th Sep, 2013, 02:23 AM
Post: #19
IriDium Offline
Inquisitor
******
Posts: 2,025
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 170
RE: beta2
Well maybe it's time to release to the general public - as (unstable) testing.

Offer an image file only (on the xbian website - this will lessen the hits on mk's server) - no upgrade options - just yet.

And see what issues are found.

Please read before you post
How to post a log file

If you liked my help, click on "Thanks" to show your appreciation.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
6th Sep, 2013, 04:04 AM
Post: #20
namtih Offline
Tester
Posts: 269
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 28
RE: beta2
Here are my logs. My installation was a fresh Beta1.1 image used since release. So no old Alpha5 crap, but I've customized some things. So no 100% Beta1.1 system.
apt-get upgrade: http://pastebin.com/WQ6MA02t
At the end is an LIRC startup error.
apt-get xbian-update: http://pastebin.com/tugAnQXc
There's also an LIRC error. Also an "rng-tools" issue.
"deconfigure xbian-package-xbmc (broken by xbian-update)"???

The result is that it isn't starting anymore after the automatic restart. No xbian logo, nothing. It hangs here since 15 minutes - no ssh connection possible:
http://www.imagebanana.com/view/f2frevax/20130905_200145.jpg

My cmdline.txt:
Code:
sdhci-bcm2708.sync_after_dma=0 dwc_otg.lpm_enable=0 console=tty1 root=/dev/sda2 rootfsopts=subvol=root/@,noatime,compress=lzo,thread_pool=1,space_cache,autodefrag rootfstype=btrfs rootwait smsc95xx.turbo_mode=N elevator=noop nohdparm noswap mod_scsi.scan=async
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
6th Sep, 2013, 04:24 AM
Post: #21
IriDium Offline
Inquisitor
******
Posts: 2,025
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 170
RE: beta2
@namtih. Something is not right.

The output from the upgrade looks wrong. That would be the output from say a week ago - with all those packages kept back. In earlier upgrades, it was necessary to install all of the "kept back" packages. This could explain the system halt as certain packages are missing.
I've also seen the other errors, but only on earlier upgrades.

However, the last upgrade I did (Yesterday), only two packages were kept back (somewhere in this thread) which xbian-update takes care of.

The only thing I can think of a the moment is - did you do an apt-get clean? prior to the upgrade as you may have had old data stored locally.

Please read before you post
How to post a log file

If you liked my help, click on "Thanks" to show your appreciation.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
6th Sep, 2013, 04:27 AM
Post: #22
namtih Offline
Tester
Posts: 269
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 28
RE: beta2
(6th Sep, 2013 04:24 AM)IriDium Wrote:  The only thing I can think of a the moment is - did you do an apt-get clean? prior to the upgrade as you may have had old data stored locally.

Yes, I did. You can see it in the first log and in the first line.
I think the btrfs filesystem got corrupted through the update. In the screenshot posted above you will find the lines:
Code:
btrfs: mismatching generation and generation_v2 found in root item. This root was probably mounted with an older kernel. Resetting all new fields.
moving root
switching root
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
6th Sep, 2013, 04:41 AM
Post: #23
IriDium Offline
Inquisitor
******
Posts: 2,025
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 170
RE: beta2
(6th Sep, 2013 04:27 AM)namtih Wrote:  
(6th Sep, 2013 04:24 AM)IriDium Wrote:  The only thing I can think of a the moment is - did you do an apt-get clean? prior to the upgrade as you may have had old data stored locally.

Yes, I did. You can see it in the first log and in the first line.
If I had a brain - I could be dangerous. Didn't see that "small" addition.Cool

It looks like "we have gone back in time" and the "old" packages are back. I wonder if MK's server has had problems or something.

The output is just wrong..... I've done this upgrade so many times, I feel I know the output off by heart.

Everything went well for me the last 4 test installs, so I am at a loss.

I wonder if this is because you are booting off a HDD and not the "normal" SD Card?

Can you try with a "Normal" SD card and see if you have the same issues.

Please read before you post
How to post a log file

If you liked my help, click on "Thanks" to show your appreciation.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
6th Sep, 2013, 05:06 AM
Post: #24
namtih Offline
Tester
Posts: 269
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 28
RE: beta2
Before the update I've made an backup image of the USB drive with win32diskimager. I've now restored the image to the USB drive, but it's also hanging now while booting....
http://www.imagebanana.com/view/z5pvit3f/20130905_210327.jpg

And it worked perfectly before the update. So I have no clue why the backup also isn't working anymore now!?

Edit:
I've connected the second USB drive with the media files again and it's booting now with the backup image. Probably because the sda1/sda2 assignment is now correct. So at least my backup is now running again.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
7th Sep, 2013, 04:42 AM
Post: #25
IriDium Offline
Inquisitor
******
Posts: 2,025
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 170
RE: beta2
I'm getting pages and pages now of:-

19:37:58 T:2986341440 WARNING: CecLogMessage - unhandled response received: opcode=89 (or 90, 87) initiator=1 destination=0 response=0.

Restarting XBMC resolves the issue.

Please read before you post
How to post a log file

If you liked my help, click on "Thanks" to show your appreciation.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
8th Sep, 2013, 05:39 AM
Post: #26
mk01 Offline
Registered
Posts: 2,485
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 209
RE: beta2
(6th Sep, 2013 04:04 AM)namtih Wrote:  My cmdline.txt:
Code:
sdhci-bcm2708.sync_after_dma=0 dwc_otg.lpm_enable=0 console=tty1 root=/dev/sda2 rootfsopts=subvol=root/@,noatime,compress=lzo,thread_pool=1,space_cache,autodefrag rootfstype=btrfs rootwait smsc95xx.turbo_mode=N elevator=noop nohdparm noswap mod_scsi.scan=async

the two errors during upgrade are ok, both because the needed devices/services will be available only after restart with proper kernel.

just the cmdline.txt looks wrong. like it would not be upgraded. i'm just wondering how your /etc/fstab looked like at the time of running upgrade, specially "/boot" record - and whether /boot could be mounted at that time from device /dev/mmcblk0p1.

nevertheless the cmdline.txt should be looking like this:
Code:
sdhci-bcm2708.sync_after_dma=0 dwc_otg.lpm_enable=0 console=tty1 root=/dev/sda2  rootfsopts=subvol=root/@,noatime,autodefrag,thread_pool=3,compress=lzo rootfstype=btrfs rootwait=10 smsc95xx.turbo_mode=Y elevator=deadline logo.nologo quiet noswap loglevel=0 mod_scsi.scan=sync partswap startevent=xbian splash nohdparm

specially the "startevent=xbian" is important. otherwise it can do "nothing" as you describe it.

(6th Sep, 2013 05:06 AM)namtih Wrote:  Before the update I've made an backup image of the USB drive with win32diskimager. I've now restored the image to the USB drive, but it's also hanging now while booting....
http://www.imagebanana.com/view/z5pvit3f/20130905_210327.jpg

just to provide more info - beta1 needs to be booted without "startevent=" parameter, beta2 with it.

the "btrfs generations" just mean, you mounted the filesystem with newer kernel, then reverted to old(er) one. btrfs driver (from older kernel currently booting) found records it can't understand.

if you created the /dev/sda copy with dd with copying whole /dev/mmcblk0, then the BOOT first partition got copied including the same LABEL and UUID which could cause that during update your 1st partition from /dev/sda got mounted instead of the right one which caused kernel & initramfs & cmdline.txt update on wrong partition - definitely not the one which is used by RPI firmware to boot the system up (/dev/mmcblk0p1).

can confirm this? or can you post output of running "sudo blkid" ?

Please read rules and do a search before you post! . FAQs . How to post log file? . Looking for answers? Please start here
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
8th Sep, 2013, 07:55 AM
Post: #27
xraxor Offline
Registered
Posts: 177
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 9
RE: beta2
guys, installed beta2 the other day, today im getting this weird problem which never had with my Pi or TV.

Earlier on started watching youtube video, and suddenly the tv would go black, the audio cuts and come back, but the image doesn't. The TV says something like "Unsupported signal. Check your device output". never had this before. also happened while I was watching a movie, many time, I have to stop and resume, and still does that. am using same settings as always.

What you guys think about this?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
8th Sep, 2013, 08:06 AM
Post: #28
mk01 Offline
Registered
Posts: 2,485
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 209
RE: beta2
@xraxor, can you do from ssh:

"sudo echo manual > /etc/init/xbian-xbmc-bridge.override " and reboot?

what is in xbmc.log when this happens ?

Please read rules and do a search before you post! . FAQs . How to post log file? . Looking for answers? Please start here
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
8th Sep, 2013, 05:47 PM
Post: #29
namtih Offline
Tester
Posts: 269
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 28
RE: beta2
Hello Matus,
thanks for the feedback. Here are the infos:
Terminal
root@xbian ~ # more /etc/fstab
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
LABEL=xbian-root-btrfs / btrfs subvol=root/@,thread_pool=3,rw,compress=lzo,noatime,autodefrag 0 0
LABEL=xbian-root-btrfs /home btrfs subvol=home/@,thread_pool=3,rw,compress=lzo,noatime,autodefrag 0 0
UUID=8B12-9112 /boot vfat defaults,sync 0 0
UUID=DA205B73205B559B /mnt/hdd ntfs-3g defaults,noatime,nodiratime,async,big_writes 0 0

Terminal
root@xbian ~ # sudo blkid
/dev/zram0: UUID="d4e72b25-f5f5-48b3-afa2-cd2da548ff9e" TYPE="swap"
/dev/sda2: LABEL="xbian-root-btrfs" UUID="d06e41d3-e15b-449d-a853-a09b70341912" UUID_SUB="cd92079e-397e-4ed9-b5cb-d36b2154d556" TYPE="btrfs"
/dev/mmcblk0p1: SEC_TYPE="msdos" UUID="8B12-9112" TYPE="vfat"
/dev/sda1: SEC_TYPE="msdos" UUID="8B12-9112" TYPE="vfat"
/dev/sdb1: UUID="DA205B73205B559B" TYPE="ntfs"
/dev/loop0: UUID="17b2b3d6-f7d4-425d-811e-348284d8332c" TYPE="swap"

Is there an option to exclude the auto-restart after the xbian update?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
8th Sep, 2013, 07:02 PM
Post: #30
mk01 Offline
Registered
Posts: 2,485
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 209
RE: beta2
@namtih

ok, so it is like I assumed before.

I already changed mounting /boot not to follow /etc/fstab but mount /dev/mmcblk0p1 directly.

Also /etc/fstab should be changed by xbian-update to use /dev/mmcblk0p1 as device for mounting /boot.

if you mean disable reboot after installing, then create file /run/noreboot (before xbian-update will start installing).

Code:
touch /run/noreboot

Please read rules and do a search before you post! . FAQs . How to post log file? . Looking for answers? Please start here
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (51): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 51 Next »
Post Reply 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

Current time: 10th May, 2025, 09:56 PM Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.