[mk01]

@freem@n

I demonstrated XBian with much lover OC, without patched Amber and without patched XBMC during B2 devel to provide the same experience on 1080 resolution and 1080 internal XBMC GUI rendering!!! OpenElec on the screen was 720 gui, using 256mb GPU mem to precache images, images have been crimp-led from 4byte coloring to 2byte. this is not optimization, this is called down sizing. and the HW condition as waste of resources.

Is this not something to be considered as superior? If we post info that in last week patches were super giga ultra optimizations - will that make you happier? will you feel like your RPI is suddenly really so much more responsive?

to answer your question. yes, most of the patches were pulled in. nobody realized. as there was nothing to realize. it is always in people's head. and the MAD OC in the video

according to release notes each month with RaspBMC, it is faster and faster. then you checks hard logs and then you realize no, only background picture is nicer.

---

(9th Jan, 2014 03:00 AM)CurlyMo Wrote:  The funny thing is that XBian could play the Hobbit part 1 (1080p 14G) fluently where the AC Ryan couldn't. The biggest file i tested was Tree of Life (1080p 17G).

we have user playing 24-28GB blue rays. he had only to make NFS buffers smaller. DTS was decoded on RPI.